A former Lake Country hairstylist can move forward with a sex discrimination claim she filed after a co-worker called her 㽶Ƶֱhun, honey and sweetie,㽶Ƶֱ according to a recent decision by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal.
Brigette Hollett launched the case against Valentina㽶Ƶֱs Hair Studio and her former boss, Cecilia Burtch, after a male co-worker looked at her and referred to her 㽶Ƶֱinappropriately㽶Ƶֱ in June 2017.
The Tribunal㽶Ƶֱs decision, released Oct. 30, refers to the male coworker in question as M.
Hollett alleges she was sexually harassed by M, who called her 㽶Ƶֱhun㽶Ƶֱ on her first day of work at the salon. She was made to feel uncomfortable again the next day when he called her 㽶Ƶֱhoney and 㽶Ƶֱsweetie㽶Ƶֱ and looked at her buttocks.
The hair studio applied to have the case dismissed on the grounds that M referred to everyone as 㽶Ƶֱhoney㽶Ƶֱ and 㽶Ƶֱsweetie,㽶Ƶֱ with no one else taking offence. However, the Tribunal said that argument missed the point, because the focus of the claim is on the effect the words had on Hollett.
㽶ƵֱMs. Hollett does not have to prove M intended to discriminate against her. The focus of human rights law is on discriminatory impact, not discriminatory intent,㽶Ƶֱ reads the decision, which ultimately denied the hair salon㽶Ƶֱs application to have the case dismissed.
READ MORE:
According to the decision, an altercation took place between M and Hollett㽶Ƶֱs boyfriend in the parking lot outside the salon, in which her boyfriend approached M㽶Ƶֱs vehicle, banged on it, and told M to stay away from Hollett.
Hollett alleges she told Burtch she had been sexually harassed after the incident during her second day on the job, but said her boss was unsupportive and 㽶Ƶֱignored her right to reject uncomfortable situations at work.㽶Ƶֱ Instead, Burtch told Hollett to apologize to M because of the altercation.
Burtch argued she did her best to deal with the situation in a short amount of time, as Hollett quit her job soon afterwards. She also argued that she only asked Hollett to apologize because other staff members had been frightened by the altercation in the parking lot.
The tribunal dismissed these arguments as well, saying Burtch had time to deal with the situation, and the altercation did not alleviate the salon㽶Ƶֱs obligation to take the sexual harassment complaint seriously.
The decision will allow the case to go to a hearing, however, the tribunal recommended that both parties avoid a hearing and instead resolve the matter by mutual agreement, using the tribunal㽶Ƶֱs mediation services.
READ MORE: